Master Plan Steering
Committee – Vision Statement
J. P. Notaro 11-10-2005
I will start by
stating I am a lifelong resident and have watched Clinton mature from the blue
collar mill town of my youth where folks knew each other and looked out for one
another, to more of a bedroom community where there is a bit of a division
between the “townies” and some of the newer residents. I personally do not like
this division and would like to see all citizens with a common goal of
“community”. Yes, that may sound a bit like “pie in the sky” thinking but is
not totally unattainable.
My vision would
be a town with old usable old mill buildings refurbished and utilized to
provide jobs of mixed skill levels and types. From “High Tech” incubator /
small businesses like the Mill Complex in Maynard to light manufacturing to
service oriented industries. I also wouldn’t be against a new industrial area
that would be used for the same sort of enterprises. The older mill buildings
are much better suited to business, industry and office space than to utilize
for yet more condominiums and apartments. Remember, commercial property is
taxed at 1.60% of residential property. Converting this property will also
diminish our tax base vs. services and infrastructure needed.
Another part of
my vision is that the town that can provide the best services possible in the most efficient and cost effective way. This
would include recreational areas usable by all citizens for different
activities. Fields for ball playing, open space for passive and active
recreation.
My vision for the
downtown area would be to further restore it to keep the historical look and
feel intact, clean up some of the storefronts and then attract niche businesses
to promote the downtown area as a destination for shopping or whatever our
planned niche provides.
For
a historical viewpoint I have included this 20 year old report to illustrate my
belief that we are overbuilt and our infrastructure and quality of life is
going to suffer as a result.
The Planning Boards Report -
Honorable Board
of Selectmen,
The year 1985 has brought tremendous pressure to develop the remaining land and
existing structures for housing in
The community, in the future, must strive for quality, rather than quantity.
Restrictive zoning bylaws in the surrounding towns will continue to bring more
pressure on
The Zoning Board of Appeals' decisions are limited to
the laws of the town and Commonwealth, and changes must be initiated for the
Board to become more effective and create a better community for all.
Respectfully submitted,
R. Carter Breed
Chairman